Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

One morning,Miles accidentally dropped a thumbtack on the chair of the office manager where he worked.The office manager sat on the tack and,two days later,was hospitalized with an infection caused by the tack.Which of the following is correct?


A) Miles's actions were negligent.
B) No tort has been committed.
C) Miles committed an intentional tort.
D) Miles is strictly liable.

E) A) and D)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Kelley went ice skating on a neighbor's pond,but she fell through a thin area into icy waters.Kelley did not have permission to be on the property,and the neighbor did not even know that she was there.Is the neighbor liable for Kelley's injuries?


A) Yes.The neighbor should have posted "thin ice" notices.
B) No.Kelley was a trespasser,and the neighbor can only be held liable for intentionally injuring her or for gross misconduct.
C) It may depend on Kelley's age.
D) Yes,the neighbor is strictly liable.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following acts resulting in injury would be negligence per se?


A) Joe sold fireworks from his Indiana store (a legal activity) to Steve,an Illinois resident (a state that has made owning fireworks illegal) .
B) June,while driving the speed limit,sideswiped the car next to her.
C) A retailer sold glue containing benzene to a 14-year-old boy in violation of state law.
D) Tammy accidentally dropped a heavy carton on Sasha's foot while at work.

E) C) and D)
F) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a negligence case,the plaintiff must establish


A) duty,strict liability,causation,and injury.
B) mens rea,breach,foreseeable harm,and injury.
C) duty,actus reus,foreseeable harm,and causation.
D) duty of due care,breach,factual cause,proximate cause,and damages.

E) B) and D)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

D

If a court applies res ipsa loquitur


A) the plaintiff needs to prove the case by a preponderance of the evidence.
B) the plaintiff must prove the case by clear and convincing evidence.
C) the defendant has the burden of proving he or she is not liable.
D) the defendant is strictly liable.

E) None of the above
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A defendant set off fireworks at a fully licensed Fourth of July show.The result of the activity caused harm to the plaintiff.In order for the plaintiff to win a case of negligence,he or she need only prove that it was foreseeable that the defendant's conduct might cause harm.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A defendant engaging in an ultrahazardous activity is almost always liable for any harm that results.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A customer in a restaurant would be considered ________ to whom the restaurant owner owes a duty ________.


A) a licensee;to warn of known dangers.
B) an invitee;of reasonable care.
C) a social guest;only to avoid intentionally injuring him.
D) a licensee;of strict liability

E) B) and D)
F) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

B

If the defendant successfully proves __________,no matter how slight the plaintiff's negligence,the plaintiff will be denied any recovery of damages.


A) contributory negligence
B) comparative negligence
C) res ipsa loquitur
D) negligence per se

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A

What is a principal factor in the risk-utility test?


A) the value of the product
B) the gravity of the danger
C) the likelihood that danger will occur
D) All of these are correct.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In strict liability,if a company sells a beverage in a can that has sharp edges and injures several consumers,it will be held liable even if it didn't know about the problem.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Res ipsa loquitur shifts the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Discuss the concepts of contributory negligence and comparative negligence.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Contributory negligence is a defense tha...

View Answer

A sports fan,injured by a hockey puck that flew into the stands during an NHL game,would be subject to the defense of assumption of the risk in a suit to recover for her injuries.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Most states recognize some form of comparative negligence.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Phillip was waiting for a bus at a bus stop.Across the street and down the block,a mechanic negligently overinflated a tire he was intending to put onto Marsha's pickup truck.The exploding tire injured Marsha and frightened a neighborhood dog,which ran down the street and knocked Phillip down,injuring his knee.Phillip sued the mechanic.In applying the Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad decision to this case,Phillip would


A) win because the mechanic was negligent in overinflating the tire,which led to Phillip's injury.
B) win based on negligence per se.
C) lose because the court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
D) lose because,although the mechanic's conduct was negligent toward Marsha,it was not a wrong in relation to Phillip,who was far away.The mechanic could not have foreseen injury to Phillip and therefore had no duty to him.

E) B) and C)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under a state law,a dog owner is absolutely liable to any person who is injured by the dog.This is an example of


A) negligence per se.
B) strict liability.
C) res ipsa loquitur.
D) negligence.

E) A) and D)
F) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Tommie,a six-year-old child,was seriously injured when he stuck a fork into an electrical outlet at a restaurant.His parents sued the restaurant where the incident occurred,claiming it should have had child protective guards on the outlets even though no law required the restaurant to do so.Whether the restaurant is liable will be dependent upon whether


A) the incident was reasonably foreseeable.
B) the court views Tommie as a licensee or a trespassing child.
C) this is negligence per se.
D) this is an ultrahazardous activity.

E) B) and C)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Kenneth was exposed to radiation on his job in an environmental cleanup.In a lawsuit against his employer,the court must decide the full extent of both present and future damages rather than allowing Kenneth to return to court years later if medical problems develop at that time.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Silas asks his friend Shelby to come to his property to go fishing at his pond.If he fails to warn her that the pier has a rotten spot and she falls through and is injured,Silas would be held liable in most states.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 1 - 20 of 45

Related Exams

Show Answer